Valery Alyshev Biography
Among them are colonies who subjected him to torture in a schizo. Judges who recognized these bullying legal and rejected the complaints of the prisoner. Investigators who aroused one absurd business against him. Prosecutors who supported this lawlessness. And also all those who wrote denunciations and tried to stipulate Navalny in the investigation and in court.
It would seem that just people from just life, they have only such work. No, these are not just people. These are those who committed meanness. The reasons found different: out of fear to remain without work, for the sake of stars and raises, according to the false understanding of their duty. Some of them reflected and, possibly, regrets the deed today.
But only one judge Natalia Repnikova did not say nothing, replacing Navalny's conditional term in the IV Rosher case with a real one. In February, she managed to write a letter to Navalny with her regret. And six months later, she died suddenly ... Exactly four years ago, January 17 of the year, Navalny returned to Russia from Germany, where he was treated after he was poisoned with a substance similar to a combat poison.
Immediately upon arrival at the Moscow Airport Sheremetyevo, he was detained and sent to a pre -trial detention center, later the court replaced him with a suspended term in the Yves Rocher case allegedly found the economic composition, although the victim and denied damage.
It was also the Cirovles case, on the process in which the governor Nikita Belykh, who later ended up in prison, spoke in defense of Alexei. Later, several more cases were aroused against Navalny, the courts continued to stamp the sentences and increase the term of imprisonment, and the colony officers - by order from above - created unbearable conditions for life, perfectly realizing that he had not yet recovered after poisoning, which miraculously ended in his death.
Zapolar Harp. The worst colony in Russia. We will begin the performers with investigators and their assistants - “witnesses” Roman Vidyukov. Photo: social networks A case of fraud on an especially large scale of part investigator for especially important cases of the first investigative department of the Office for the Investigation of Crimes against state power and in the economy of the GSU SK Roman Vidyukov accused the embezzlement of funds that sacrificed its funds and non -profit organizations.
According to the investigation, Navalny allegedly spent more than a million rubles from a million rubles for personal goals - in particular, on “the acquisition of property, material assets and payment of expenses including relaxation abroad”. According to Navalny's associates, a political matter, and was aimed at intimidating politics and not letting him return to Russia. After the guilty sentence to Navalny, both willingly distributed an interview.
But then their "glory" came to naught. Now at the craft all his social activities was limited to what he writes in his telegram channel staring posts to the opposition and comments on the news in the pro-Kremlin media and other people's criminal cases. In particular, in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda radio, Elena Blinovskaya predicted the “Queen of Marathons” that she would not be able to simply pay off debts and avoid court.
And in the year, the lawyer registered in Rospatent in his name the trademark “Beautiful Russia of the Future”, which was invented by Navalny. Vitaliy Seerukanov. Photo: social networks, in turn, Serukanov continues to cooperate with RT and “drain” them “compromising” to the Russian opposition in exile, constantly referring to anonymous sources. The investigator Vidyukov was more fortunate - he received an increase, becoming the deputy head of the Main Investigation Department of the IC of the Russian Federation.
According to media reports, he began his career in Volgograd in the year with the investigation of the case of the head of the trade unions of the Volgograd region Vyacheslav Kobosev, later sentenced to nine years in prison. Later, the investigator was transferred to Moscow, where he participated in the investigation of cases against the former Minister of Economic Development Alexei Ulyukaev and the head of the Serpukhov district Alexander Shestun.
We recall the judges of Navalny, immediately detained at his arrival from Germany on January 17 in the year in the YV-Roshe case, a conditional term for which he was exactly replaced by the real before that. The next day, the hearing was held as it is suppressed. Lawyers and the opposition himself were notified of him ... A minute before the beginning. The head of the police department, Khimki, Vitaly Senin, wrote that he was “an idea of the imprisonment of Navalny in custody”, while the decision of the judge of the Khimkinsky city court of Elena Morozova said about the “extension of the detention” of Navalny for 30 days.
As even the freshmen of the legal faculty know, the extension of the detention for a term of more than 72 hours is impossible. We add that the miracle presentation of the Khimkinsky police supported this deputy city prosecutor Khimki Elena Koloskova. Well, the judge of the Moscow Regional Court Musa Musaev will leave the Khimkinsky City Court in 10 days on the “extension of the detention of Navalny for 30 days” without changes, despite the lack of a norm in the law.
Then, the judge of the Simonovsky District Court of Moscow, Natalia Repnikova, goes to the advance.Although earlier the European Court of Human Rights of the Decision of which Russia at the time of the year still executed established the fact of the unlawfulness of this sentence. Six months later, Judge Repnikova died, according to official figures - from coronavirus. Navalny himself, already being in a colony in the Vladimir region and speaking at a meeting of the Moscow City Court on the video, examined his appeal about the verdict in the new case - on fraud and disrespect for the court, spoke about the act of Judge Repnikova.
After she replaced him with a conditional term with the real one, the judge “handed over to Navalny’s acquaintances” a letter, in which she expressed regrets about her decision and called the politician “a brave man”. The judges of the Moscow City Court, Ilnar Basyrov, Maria Dovzhenko and Maria Larkina, who listened to him, did not answer and upheld the 9-year sentence to Navalny in a strict regime colony in the fraud and disrespect for court.
Margarita Kotova. Photo: FSIN by this time two months earlier - in March of the year - sentenced the judge of the Lefortovo District Court of Moscow Margarita Kotova - a valuable and proven frame of domestic modern justice. Supporters of Navalny accused her of telephone consultations right during the trial of the politician and issued a separate investigation about this.
The SK did not engage in the official investigation of the stated facts. And President Vladimir Putin, by coincidence, Kotova, by his decree raised it to the post of judge of the Moscow City Court. He approved the indictment on fraud against Navalny, by the way, the first deputy general of the prosecutor of the Russian Federation Anatoly Razinkin. Judges of the Second Cassation Court of General Jurisdiction Ekaterina Pirozhkova, Natalia Vlasenko and Igor Chaplygin in October of the year as part of the Judicial College for Criminal Affairs of the Second Cassation Court of General Jurisdiction, the verdict of the signature of Judge Kotova in the case of “fraud” and “disavation for the court”.
They also upheld the appeal ruling of the Judicial College for Criminal Cases of the Moscow City Court under the authorship of the judges Dovzhenko, Larkina and Basyrov, this trio, we recall, did not find anything reprehensible in Kotova’s actions. He refused to transfer to the Supreme Court a complaint of Navalny to the sentence in the fraud case by the name of Alexander Kolyshnitsyn, judge of the Judicial Collegium of the Criminal case of the RF Armed Forces.
They forgot to say about the judge of the Moscow City Court Dmitry Balashov-on February 20, he upheld the decision to replace a conditional deadline with a real one in the “Iv Rocher” of letters with regret, he would live and still work in his place. Andrey Suvorov. Photo: social networks of another judge of the Moscow City Court, Andrei Suvorov, on August 4, sentenced Navalny already to 19 years in a colony of special regime in the criminal case of extremism.
Daniel was charged with extremist activity and its financing - he collected donations for the channel. Already on September 26, Judges of the First Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction Larisa Isotiev, Zoya Mikheeva and Viktor Rogov was approved by the sentence of Navalny and cold in an “extremist case”. The judge of the Supreme Court of Russia Oleg Borisov, the judge of the Supreme Court of Russia, scored the verdict on the “extremist” Case-on July 2, he, together with the Sudyei colleagues, Eduard Erdyniev and Svetlana Shmotikova, rejected the cassation complaints of Navalny’s already deceased, cold and their protection.
By the way, other judges of the Armed Forces made their contribution to the landing of Navalny even earlier. Thus, the deputy chairman of the Supreme Court Tatyana Petrova and the First Deputy Chairman of the Armed Forces, Peter Serkov, in the spring of the year, legitimized the verdict in the IV-Rauche case, leaving him in force and ignoring the decision of the ECHR, which, as already mentioned, recognized this verdict to the wrongdoing.
And all the same Eduard Erdyniev, a judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, who had stole the verdict on extremism, earlier, in the spring of the year, refused to consider Navalny’s cassation appeal to replace a conditional term with the real Rocher case now about the judges of the Vladimir region. Kirill Nikiforov. Under various and, something suggests, probably far-fetched pretexts, Mr.
Nikiforov repeatedly refused Navalny to satisfy his claims against IK-6 in Melekhovo. The claims concerned, including the conditions of detention. In December, Kirill Nikiforov went to increase - to the judge of the Vladimir Regional Court.